Ducking Stools: Punishment in Medieval England

The ducking stool was a form of punishment used in medieval and early modern England, primarily as a public humiliation for women accused of crimes like scolding, witchcraft, or "breach of the peace."

Ducking stools began appearing in England during the 12th century and were used until the early 19th century, although their use declined considerably by the late 17th century.

Their introduction coincided with a broader trend in medieval Europe where public humiliation and corporal punishment were used to maintain social order and enforce moral conduct.

The medieval justice system was often a mix of local custom, religious doctrine, and royal law, with punishments like ducking designed to reinforce authority and instill fear of stepping outside the accepted norms of the time.

Public punishments like the ducking stool were also a way of entertaining the population, turning criminal justice into a form of spectacle.

It was particularly associated with punishing women labeled as "common scolds" - those who were seen as excessively quarrelsome or disruptive within their community.

While men were occasionally punished with ducking, the stool was largely aimed at women, reflecting societal views of gender roles and behaviour during that time.

The ducking stool typically consisted of a wooden chair mounted on a long beam or lever, placed near a body of water such as a river or pond.

The accused woman would be seated in the chair, and the stool would be lowered or "ducked" into the water repeatedly, submerging the individual for brief periods before lifting her out again.

The number of duckings could vary depending on the severity of the offence.

The punishment often took place in public squares or along busy riverbanks to ensure a large crowd could witness the event, adding to the humiliation.

Ducking was not necessarily meant to be fatal, but it could cause serious harm, especially in cold weather, and some victims are believed to have died from shock or drowning.

One of the most famous examples of a woman punished using the ducking stool is Elizabeth Caledon, who lived in Leominster, and was subjected to this punishment in 1809 - one of the last recorded uses of the device.

A large crowd gathered for the event.

Elizabeth was accused of being a "common scold," a term used to describe women who were seen as troublesome, quarrelsome, or disruptive in their community.

Her punishment arose from repeated complaints that she verbally harassed her neighbours, often causing public disturbances.

In the eyes of the law at the time, she fit the profile of someone whose "disorderly" and "unwomanly" behaviour could only be curbed by a public punishment designed to shame and silence her.

Elizabeth Caledon’s case gained some notoriety because the ducking stool was seen as an archaic form of punishment by the early 19th century.

By this time, many viewed it as a relic of the medieval period, and its use was becoming increasingly rare.

By the 18th century, the ducking stool fell out of favor as legal reforms and changing attitudes toward punishment took hold.

Public executions and corporal punishments gradually became less common, and the emerging emphasis on reform and rehabilitation began to replace the punitive justice system of medieval England.

The last recorded use of a ducking stool was in 1817 in the town of Leominster, England.

Other forms of punishment in Medieval England

One of the most infamous forms of punishment was the pillory. The convicted person would be placed in a wooden frame that locked their head and hands in place, leaving them exposed to the crowd.

Positioned in busy market squares, pillories turned punishment into a public spectacle, with onlookers pelting the person with rotten food, mud, or even stones.

This form of punishment was commonly used for crimes like perjury, fraud, or selling adulterated goods.

While in the pillory, the individual was at the mercy of the crowd’s fury, and serious injury or death was not uncommon.

What made the pillory particularly effective as a tool of humiliation was its location in a central, highly visible place, ensuring the convicted person’s shame was amplified by their exposure to the entire community.

Another widespread form of public punishment was the stocks. Unlike the pillory, which constrained the head and hands, the stocks immobilized the person’s feet.

Set in busy public squares, stocks would leave the criminal seated or lying down, with their feet locked in place.

This punishment was less severe than the pillory but equally humiliating, with passersby hurling insults or objects at the restrained individual.

It was often used for petty crimes, such as drunkenness, minor theft, or public disorder, and could last for hours or even days.

As with other forms of public punishment, the goal of the stocks was to publicly expose the individual, allowing them to face ridicule and scorn from their neighbours.

Whipping was another common punishment, often conducted in a public space to heighten the shame of the offender.

In market squares or crossroads, the convicted person would be tied to a post, and a designated authority figure, such as a constable, would administer the lashes.

The number of lashes depended on the severity of the crime, with the sound of the whip and the cries of the victim drawing a crowd.

Public whippings were commonly used for theft, vagrancy, or moral crimes like adultery.

The physical pain was acute, but the public nature of the punishment ensured the individual's humiliation was just as devastating.

The marks and scars from the whipping would also serve as a lasting reminder of their crime.

Another brutal yet common practice was branding, used to permanently mark a criminal for life.

Typically, a heated iron would be pressed onto the offender's skin, leaving a burn mark that signified their crime.

Different letters would be used to denote specific offence, for instance, the letter "T" for thieves, or "F" for felons.

For lesser crimes, a practice known as shaming was employed.

This often involved parading the offender through the streets, usually naked or in rags, while being jeered at by the crowd.

Sometimes, the person would be forced to carry a sign describing their crime or wear a "badge of shame," marking them out for public ridicule.

If you enjoyed this blog post, please follow Exploring GB on Facebook for daily travel content and inspiration.

Don’t forget to check out our latest blog posts below!

Thank you for visiting Exploring GB.